Blogs/Events/Articles/News

Category:

Standing Found in Abuse Case Where Parties Dated Twice

Under the Protection from Abuse Act (PFA Act), "abuse" is defined as follows: "The occurrence of one or more of the following acts between family or household members, sexual or intimate partners or persons who share biological parenthood: (1) Attempting to cause or intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causing bodily injury, serious bodily injury...

Read more >>

Superior Court Weighs in on Jurisdictional Issues in Child Custody

Recently, a number of Pennsylvania Superior Court cases have been published pertaining to jurisdiction in child custody cases. The cases of R.M. v. J.S. , C.L. v. Z.M.F.H. and B.J.D. v. D.L.C. will be addressed in this article. Jurisdictional disputes in child custody cases are always a hot topic for family law practitioners. In 2004, Pennsylvania...

Read more >>

Panel Denies Credit for 'Time Served' in Child Support Civil Contempt

An interesting issue was raised recently in a Pennsylvania Superior Court case pertaining to civil contempt in a child support case. In Warmkessel v. Heffner , Eric Heffner appealed a trial court's order refusing to give him credit for time that he served incarcerated as a result of an outstanding bench warrant against his incarceration sanction re...

Read more >>

New Child Custody Act Ushers in Sweeping Changes

On Jan. 24, the new Child Custody Act (Act No. 112 of 2010) went into effect. The new Child Custody Act begins at 23 Pa. C.S.A. §5321 and concludes at 23 Pa. C.S.A. §5340, and replaces sections 5301 through 5315, as well as Section 4346. The act was approximately 10 years in the making and is prospective and applies to actions commenced o...

Read more >>

Support Order Increased Without Cross-Petition to Modify

The recent case of Brickus v. Dent provides practitioners with a reminder that support orders may be modified in any appropriate manner — either upwardly or downwardly — regardless of whether the petitioner is seeking an upward or downward modification of the order and the respondent does not file a counter/cross-petition to modify. Br...

Read more >>

Tax Ramifications and Costs in Equitable Distribution

The recent Superior Court case of Balicki v. Balicki has sent shock waves throughout the family law community. The question family law practitioners face is whether the Balicki decision mandates the court to apply tax ramifications and the costs of sale to all assets when equitably dividing the marital estate. In 2005, the Pennsylvania Divorce Cod...

Read more >>

Local Customs and Practices Cannot Determine Custody Cases

Recently, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has published two opinions reiterating the well-established case law mandating a fact-specific analysis of the children's best interests by the court in deciding custody disputes as opposed to relying on local custom, practice or judicial norms. The most recent case on this issue is the 2010 state Superior ...

Read more >>

Late Custody Case 1925(b) Statement Deemed Waived on Appeal

The 2010 Superior Court case J.P. vs. S.P. is a reminder of the importance of complying with a court order directing the filing of a Rule 1925(b) Concise Statement of Errors Complained of on Appeal. As held by the Superior Court in the present case, failure to follow such an order will result in a waiver of all matters complained of on appeal, whic...

Read more >>

Jurisdiction and Inconvenient Forum Under the UCCJEA

Issues pertaining to exclusive continuing jurisdiction and inconvenient forum in child custody cases are often hot topics among family law practitioners. Recently, the case of A.D v. M.A.B., addressed both of these issues. Because Pennsylvania adopted the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) a number of years ago, matter...

Read more >>

Enforcing Mortgage Payment Provision in a Postnuptial Agreement

The recent case of Miller v. Miller raises interesting issues for the family law practitioner. Generally, the Miller case pertains to a postnuptial agreement entered between the parties, which included a provision that the husband should pay for the mortgage, taxes and insurance on the marital residence until the marital residence was sold. The f...

Read more >>